Skip to content Skip to main menu Site Map spider trap - don't go here
. . . . .
Site Map   
The FSI home page
Grosvenor Cottage
30 Grosvenor Street, Neutral Bay
Sydney, NSW 2089 Australia
Ph: 02 9904 5600
Fax: 02 9904 5611
Coming to grips with family systems theory in a collaborative, learning environment.
Note that we are currently on the move to a new site http://www.familysystemstraining.com.
Menu items ** marked with asterisks ** will redirect you our new site.

Thanks for your patience during this time.
Home > ... > Illustration and Critique > The Theory > 1 - Emotional Fusion and Differentiation of Self
 

1 - Emotional Fusion and Differentiation of Self

'Fusion' or 'lack of differentiation' is where individual choices are set aside in the service of achieving harmony within the system.
Fusion can be expressed either as:
  • a sense of intense responsibility for another's reactions, or
  • by emotional 'cutoff' from the tension within a relationship (Kerr and Bowen, 1988; Herz Brown, 1991).
Bowen's research led him to suggest that varying degrees of fusion are discernible in all families.
'Differentiation', by contrast, is described as the capacity of the individual to function autonomously by making self directed choices, while remaining emotionally connected to the intensity of a significant relationship system (Kerr and Bowen, 1988).
Bowen's notion of fusion has a different focus to Minuchin's concept of enmeshment, which is based on a lack of boundary between sub-systems (Minuchin, 1974).  The structural terms 'enmeshment' and 'disengagement' are in fact the twin polarities of Bowen's 'fusion'.
Fusion describes each person's reactions within a relationship, rather than the overall structure of family relationships.  Hence, anxiously cutting off the relationship is as much a sign of fusion as intense submissiveness.  A person in a fused relationship reacts immediately (as if with a reflex, knee jerk response) to the perceived demands of another person, without being able to think through the choices or talk over relationship matters directly with the other person.  Energy is invested in taking things personally (ensuring the emotional comfort of another), or in distancing oneself (ensuring one's own).
The greater a family's tendency to fuse, the less flexibility it will have in adapting to stress.
Bowen developed the idea of a 'differentiation of self scale' to assist in teaching this concept.  He points out that this was not designed as an actual instrument for assigning people to particular levels (Kerr and Bowen, 1988: 97-98).  Bowen maintains that the speculative nature of estimating a level of differentiation is compounded by factors such as stress levels, individual differences in reactivity to different stressors, and the degree of contact individuals have with their extended family.  At one end of the scale, hypothetical 'complete differentiation' is said to exist in a person who has resolved their emotional attachment to their family (ie. shifted out of their roles in relationship triangles) and can therefore function as an individual within the family group.
Bowen did acknowledge that this was a lifelong process and that 'total' differentiation is not possible to attain.
 
previous page symbol The Theorytable of contents symbol
Table of Contents
2 - Triangles next page symbol
This paper was written by Jenny Brown and was originally published in the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy (ANZJFT, 1999, Vol.20, No.2, pp 94-103).
The full paper is available as a pdf (221K - 10 pages - 2 columns per page).
Please contact us if you would like a printed copy sent in the post.
 
The Family Systems Institute
30 Grosvenor Street, Neutral Bay
Sydney, NSW, 2089
ABN: 49 082 618 808
Ph: 02 9904 5600
Fax: 02 9904 5611
To contact The FSI or subscribe to our newsletter (issue 3 or 4 times per year) please email or phone us
email of the fsi - please phone +61 2 9904 5600
Construction and management by
bpresent
.
.